Graphical abstract

Introduction

Pandemics represent a significant global health challenge, punctuating human history with indelible marks on societies and reshaping the trajectory of public health. From the Spanish flu of 1918 to the more recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, these events are characterized by the widespread and sustained transmission of infectious agents, causing pervasive illness and societal disruption. They underscore the vulnerability of human populations to infectious diseases [1–3]. These historical events serve as stark reminders of the diverse and profound impacts that pandemics have on societies, economies, and cultures across centuries [3].

At the core of pandemics lies the science of infectious diseases, which involves a complex interplay among pathogens, hosts, and the environment. It is crucial to understand the modes of transmission, the role of reservoirs, and the factors that influence the evolution of virulence. Zoonotic spillover events, in which pathogens jump from animals to humans, are key drivers in the emergence of novel infectious diseases. Moreover, the globalized nature of our interconnected world, enhanced by international travel and trade, plays a critical role in the rapid spread of these agents across borders [1,3]. Although there has been progress in understanding the biological mechanisms and immediate responses to pandemics, a significant gap remains in addressing their broader socioeconomic, environmental, technological, and ethical impacts. These factors have the potential to either effectively manage or mismanage a pandemic, as will be discussed in the following sections [4].

The Social, and Psychological Impacts of Pandemics

The socioeconomic and psychological impacts of pandemics are profound, altering human behaviors, exacerbating mental health challenges, and inducing significant shifts in societal norms [5,6]. For example, sleep disorders are conditions with both psychological and socioeconomic repercussions. In their study, Checa-Ros et al. [7] identified 4 distinct patterns of melatonin production and excretion among children with sleep disorders. A few years later, Choudhry et al. [8] reported that insomnia significantly affected patients who had recovered from COVID-19, necessitating consultation and treatment to mitigate long-term consequences. Melatonin, which is synthesized by the pineal gland, is known for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory activities. Its antiviral properties, cost-effectiveness, minimal side effects, and particularly its ability to enhance humoral immunity by suppressing inflammatory products and boosting the immune system—especially when activity is low or suppressed—make it a potential adjuvant in the treatment of COVID-19. Molina-Carballo et al. [9] demonstrated its effectiveness as a therapeutic alternative for treating COVID-19 infection in a systematic review conducted in 2022. Although further clinical trials are recommended, these studies illustrate how the psychosocial impacts of the pandemic can be linked to its socioeconomic burden and broader effects on public health. They also highlight how scientific and technological advancements targeting specific conditions may contribute to innovative solutions in pandemic management.

Climate and Environmental Changes

Climate hazards impact the spread of infectious diseases through various direct and indirect mechanisms. These mechanisms include gradual increases in temperature, environmental changes that facilitate the proliferation of disease vectors such as mosquitoes, rodents, and ticks, and sudden extreme events such as floods. Floods can lead to the contamination of drinking water sources and the displacement of humans and animals, both of which can carry and transmit pathogens. The growing threat of climate change and environmental degradation introduces additional complexity, potentially hastening the emergence of new infectious diseases [10,11]. This interconnection underscores the urgent need for an environmentally conscious approach to pandemic preparedness and response.

Technology, Innovation, and Pandemic Prevention

Innovative treatments and preventive measures play a crucial role in managing pandemics. The 2022 systematic review by Molina-Carballo et al. [9] highlights the protective effects of melatonin administration against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and its potential inclusion in treatment protocols as an innovative approach. Furthermore, technological advancements, especially in artificial intelligence (AI) and big data, are revolutionizing our ability to track, predict, and manage pandemic scenarios, providing essential support to vulnerable populations [12–14].

Ambient intelligence represents an emerging concept where information technology is employed to establish networks of interconnected devices and services. These networks dynamically collaborate to assist individuals in various activities. A recent study focusing on security-enhanced ambient assisted living that supports school activities during hospitalization illustrates how this technology can help mitigate the broader socioeconomic impacts of pandemics [15]. By facilitating educational activities and addressing ethical concerns, while also enhancing the ability to provide care under diverse conditions, such technologies ensure that vulnerable populations receive the necessary support during health crises [12,15].

Ethical Aspects of Pandemics

Ethical considerations are paramount during pandemics. Balancing public health measures with individual freedoms, ethically allocating scarce medical resources, and addressing global health inequities present challenges that require thoughtful and humane responses [16,17]. Understanding these dimensions has profound implications for societal resilience and sustainability.

The interplay between these factors and pandemics is crucial for devising holistic strategies, yet it is often underexplored in current literature [4]. This study aims to address gaps in pandemic preparedness by comprehensively exploring various dimensions, enhancing global health systems, supporting sustainable development goals (SDGs), and improving our ability to manage future pandemics [5,11,17]. A multidisciplinary approach is essential, integrating insights from virology, public health, technology, economics, and social sciences [4,11,12,17] to better predict, prevent, and respond to global health threats in an informed and sustainable manner. This review covers pandemics biological, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological aspects, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to strengthen defenses against global health threats [18–20].

Materials and Methods

This narrative literature review was conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of pathogens, societal responses, and the natural interplay between infectious agents and human populations [21]. Traditional academic and clinical training typically prepares clinicians and researchers for one-on-one interactions with patients. However, the broader public health challenges presented by pandemic care require decision-makers to adopt a multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and transdisciplinary approach to population-based issues, which is often unfamiliar to most.

Search Strategy

We meticulously crafted a systematic search strategy to explore the pandemic’s socioeconomic, technological, and environmental dimensions. Using major databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, we employed predefined keywords either in isolation or in combination. Furthermore, we implemented “practical action research” to analyze the outcomes and simultaneously investigate emerging insights during our analysis [22]. This approach provided a blend of operational and critical reflection through action research, utilizing a spiral of “planning-acting-observing-reflecting.” It allowed us to contextualize the existing pandemic response, question why certain gaps exist, and explore potential improvement strategies based on practical performances.

To ensure a comprehensive review, we also examined the reference lists of identified studies to uncover any potentially overlooked works, thereby minimizing the risk of missing relevant literature. The selection criteria were designed to capture the most recent and pertinent insights into pandemic research, with a focus on studies that offered novel perspectives on the socioeconomic, technological, or environmental aspects of pandemics. This thorough and targeted approach to the literature review facilitated the collection of a diverse and robust body of evidence, which served as the cornerstone of our analysis.

Keywords

The following keywords were used alone or in combination: pandemics, infectious diseases, public health responses, and societal impact. Each keyword was isolated during database searches to reduce the number of hits.

Search Strings

The search strings used for all databases were: pandemics (AND) infectious (AND) diseases (AND) public (AND) health (AND) responses (AND) societal (AND) impacts.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies published in English, without any time limitations, focusing on the epidemiology, public health responses, and social implications of pandemics. Studies that did not directly address these themes or lacked empirical data were excluded.

Data Analysis and Extraction

Data extraction concentrated on the objectives, methodologies, key findings, and conclusions of each study. This information underwent qualitative analysis to identify common themes, trends, and divergences within the literature. The quality of each study was evaluated based on its methodology, potential biases, and the reliability of its findings.

Data Selection

Studies were selected through a review of their titles and abstracts. Two authors independently assessed all the compiled documents, striving to reach a consensus. When disagreements arose regarding the inclusion of a study, a third author was consulted to make the final decision. The findings were thematically organized and summarized under relevant subheadings [23], offering a structured overview of the current understanding of pandemics.

Results

The initial search yielded the following 26 results from PubMed, 16 from Scopus, and 30 from Web of Science. Given the “action research” design of our study, we adopted a dynamic approach that allowed for the continuous incorporation of new studies, thus increasing the total number of papers included. Although this strategy was time-consuming, it enabled us to address immediate issues by practically exploring published solutions. This approach was particularly effective in evaluating existing systems and implementing new changes.

Of the 72 studies retrieved from the search, 22 were duplicates, 31 were irrelevant, and 5 were excluded for other reasons. Additional studies were identified and included after reviewing the reference lists of the papers initially selected or as deemed necessary upon further reading. The compiled studies were evaluated for eligibility, and examined in detail. All papers that met the inclusion criteria were utilized (see the reference section). Finally, the content from the included articles was organized into various categories reflecting their differences and similarities.

Pandemics’ Etiology and Impacts: From Past to Present

Pandemics have had profound impacts on societies, economies, and public health throughout the centuries. Advances in medicine and public health practices have helped to mitigate their effects. Table 1 summarizes the major pandemics in history [2,20–33].

Despite their unique characteristics, pandemics share several common factors: they are typically caused by bacteria, viruses, or other pathogens and often spread through human-to-human transmission via respiratory droplets, contaminated surfaces, or other methods. The rapid spread of infectious diseases is facilitated by global travel, connectivity, and trade, which pose significant challenges to containment efforts [25–33]. Additionally, the high population density in urban areas, characterized by crowded living conditions and close contact, further accelerates the transmission of diseases [2,25–33]. Novel or highly mutative infectious agents often encounter populations that lack pre-existing immunity, thereby increasing susceptibility and facilitating the spread of the disease. Previous research suggests that certain cultural groups may temporarily experience either advantages or disadvantages in disease outcomes [2,18,19,34].

Delays in detecting and responding to new pathogens have historically facilitated widespread transmission. The capacity and resilience of healthcare systems play a crucial role in effective disease management and control. Understanding these common factors is essential for developing public health strategies and preparedness to mitigate future pandemics. Global cooperation, early detection, rapid response, and investment in healthcare infrastructure are vital for effective pandemic responses [4,6,20].

Socioeconomic Challenges

Socioeconomic factors such as poverty, limited or inadequate access to healthcare, and societal inequalities can exacerbate the effects of pandemics. Vulnerable populations are often disproportionately impacted. The availability of vaccines and effective treatments plays a significant role in shaping the trajectory of a pandemic. The development, production, and distribution of vaccines and treatments are essential for controlling the spread of infectious diseases [2,4,19,27,35–37].

Healthcare providers

While the immediate focus during a pandemic is typically on the relevant infectious diseases, its impact spreads widely, significantly affecting various other medical specialties, healthcare staff, their productivity, and the availability of financial resources [38]. Although these circumstances lead to financial constraints, they can also foster opportunities for collaboration [4,5,20,33,35].

Specialist care

Infectious disease specialists and epidemiologists are at the forefront of managing and controlling the spread of diseases. They provide patient care and implement public health measures. Public health experts engage in surveillance activities and communicate with the public to prevent further transmission. Pediatric infectious disease specialists focus on the specific needs of children, including how the disease presents, potential complications, and vaccination strategies tailored for pediatric populations. Rheumatologists and immunologists modify treatments for particularly vulnerable patients. Neurologists address neurological complications, whereas respiratory specialists manage conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia. Cardiologists may encounter an increase in cardiovascular complications, and disruptions in cancer care are also possible. Primary care physicians triage patients and address non-pandemic-related health issues, while dentists enforce infection control protocols. Psychiatrists provide support for individuals dealing with increased stress and mental health challenges during pandemics [37–41]. Pandemics can cause a significant increase in the number of critically ill patients, which places immense pressure on critical care and emergency medicine services. Intensive care units may face a higher demand for ventilators, medical staff, and specialized equipment. Although there is a decrease in trauma care admissions, the pattern and quality of care generally remain unchanged [42].

Socioeconomic impacts on healthcare

This interconnected network of experts and specialists could provide an opportunity to enhance high-quality care and alleviate financial burdens if structured collaboratively [43,44]. Understanding the broad socioeconomic impacts of pandemics is essential for comprehensive pandemic preparedness and response. Pandemics test the frontline specialties that directly handle infectious agents and impose extraordinary demands on the entire healthcare ecosystem, underscoring the importance of a holistic approach to managing global health crises with sufficient human and financial resources.

Nevertheless, pandemics can also drive innovation and lead to unique solutions by utilizing a multiagency workforce to establish new response units and transform financial losses into successful projects. A recent study from Thailand exemplifies this. A home isolation care center was created, employing a team with diverse specialties and backgrounds to diagnose, treat, and provide daily care to around 6,000 COVID-19 patients, demonstrating the effectiveness of a flexible surge capacity concept [43,44]. Healthcare administrators play a pivotal role in managing resources during a pandemic. This includes distributing medical supplies, coordinating staff, and overseeing the overall operation of healthcare facilities. Their actions underscore the necessity for flexibility within the healthcare system [44].

Medical research and education

During a pandemic, the focus of medical research often shifts to prioritize understanding the infectious agent, developing treatments and vaccines, and investigating the long-term health effects of the disease. Concurrently, medical education programs may experience disruptions, including alterations in clinical rotations, the implementation of virtual learning, and adjustments to the training schedules of medical students, residents, and fellows [45–47].

Management of pandemics

Various measures have been implemented worldwide to control the spread of infectious diseases, including pandemics such as COVID-19. Public health authorities and governments often recommend these measures to mitigate the disease’s impact. Although the specific strategies may differ depending on the pathogen's nature, Figure 1 illustrates some common measures, which include several subgroups [2,4,5,18,36,48–52].

Public and individual approaches

The primary approach focuses on minimizing person-to-person contact and the associated risks of transmission by encouraging individuals to maintain physical distance, particularly in crowded areas [48,49]. This includes implementing strategies such as reducing the capacity of public spaces, ensuring spacing on public transportation, and promoting remote and online work options to decrease the number of people in workplaces and educational settings. Additionally, large gatherings, events, and festivals are either limited or prohibited to mitigate the risk of virus spread. When gatherings do occur, it is crucial to implement protocols that ensure they are conducted safely [50,51]. Moreover, the use of face masks is recommended or mandated in public settings, especially where maintaining physical distance is difficult [52]. Further measures include implementing travel restrictions, such as border closures, quarantine requirements for travelers, and limitations on both international and domestic travel [3,4,53–55].

Promoting regular and thorough handwashing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, along with the use of hand sanitizers containing at least 60% alcohol when soap and water are unavailable, are key measures for individual protection. Additionally, implementing enhanced cleaning and sanitation protocols in public spaces, transportation systems, and high-touch surfaces addresses environmental safety [51,56]. Ensuring the availability and proper use of personal protective equipment, such as masks, gloves, and gowns, in healthcare settings and other high-risk environments, is crucial for combining protective measures at home and work, in addition to vaccination [51,52]. Vaccination campaigns aimed at achieving widespread immunity are essential for reducing the severity of illnesses in the population. Individuals should be encouraged to receive recommended vaccinations to prevent other infectious diseases [52-54].

Public communication and information

Public and individual measures are costly and require a motivated and informed public. A Japanese study found that vaccine efficacy, lifetime immunity, and fear of the pandemic positively influenced the public's willingness to use a vaccine. Conversely, the high cost of vaccines and potential side effects and toxicity negatively impacted their acceptance [52,55]. Managing the pandemic partly relies on clear and transparent communication about the pathogen, preventive measures, and the evolving situation. It is imperative to disseminate accurate information through various channels to combat misinformation and to conduct widespread testing to identify and isolate infected individuals.

Health monitoring systems and robust contact tracing are essential tools for identifying and alerting people to emerging hot spots and potential exposures to the virus. Technologies such as mobile apps have proven effective for both health monitoring and contact tracing. Quarantine measures are implemented for individuals who have either been exposed to the virus or have traveled from areas deemed high-risk. Those who test positive are isolated to prevent the virus from spreading further [2,23,53,54]. These strategies are often used in tandem and can be adapted based on the changing circumstances, scientific insights, and recommendations from public health experts. Individuals and communities must stay informed and follow the guidelines issued by public health authorities to help curb the spread of infectious diseases. Additionally, support and resources must be made available to vulnerable groups, including the elderly, those with pre-existing health conditions, and individuals experiencing economic difficulties.

The use of social media

Social media has been tested as a tool for communication and information to raise public awareness and track infected individuals during recent pandemics. These platforms play a vital role in shaping public sentiment and significantly influence behavior during public health emergencies [55]. Generally, public behavior and acceptance of rules and recommendations hinge on a trustworthy relationship with authorities and governments. Establishing such a relationship well before a pandemic is crucial to ensure the full implementation of all measures [56].

The inevitable public-politic-professional triangle

The successful management of a pandemic relies on a robust relationship among professionals, authorities, and the public. Research conducted during the recent COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a dynamic shift in public reactions over time [55]. Initially, there was a strong sense of unity, which later shifted to attributing the ongoing crisis to specific causes. As the pandemic continued, doubts about the efficacy of stringent precautionary measures grew, compounded by concerns over economic hardships and mental health issues. This progression led to increased worries about social vulnerabilities, prompting public scrutiny and criticism of government restrictions amid feelings of anxiety and confusion. Effective public health communication about COVID-19 should emphasize transparency and tackle issues related to health equity and social justice. Adopting this strategy can cultivate a sense of both individual and collective responsibility essential for protecting the public against the pandemic [53].

Another study revealed a significant trend of healthcare avoidance among the general population, particularly during the COVID-19 outbreak, indicating an underutilization of healthcare services. However, the findings also highlighted disparities in healthcare avoidance among various societal groups, with specific demographic characteristics disproportionately affected [54]. These studies provide insights into the socioeconomic patterns of healthcare utilization during emerging infectious disease outbreaks, thereby assisting public health emergency management in developing strategies to improve healthcare system preparedness, supported by more accurate financial estimations.

Globalization and pandemic

Globalization, which is characterized by increased connectivity and interdependence among countries, has both spurred advancements and introduced distinct challenges in public health, particularly in the context of pandemics. Table 2 outlines various ways in which globalization can affect the dynamics of infectious disease transmission [4,5,57,58].

Globalization has accelerated economic growth and cultural exchange but also presents significant public health challenges. Addressing these challenges requires leveraging the strengths of global connectivity for international healthcare cooperation and rapid information exchange, to manage infectious diseases. It is essential to mitigate the negative consequences of globalization, including environmental degradation and rapid urbanization, which fuels new pathogens. While globalization brings benefits, it also complicates disease management, necessitating coordinated global health efforts. Strengthening health systems, enhancing surveillance and response capabilities, and boosting international cooperation are crucial to counter pandemics in our interconnected world [48,57,58].

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic varied significantly across countries, influenced by several factors including healthcare infrastructure, governance, and public adherence to health measures [57]. Assessing how effectively a country managed COVID-19 pandemic involves considering a range of factors such as testing capacity, healthcare infrastructure, public health measures, governance, and public compliance. The success of pandemic management is also shaped by the evolving nature of the virus and the effectiveness of the response strategies. It is important to recognize that opinions on the success of a country’s response can differ, and the situation continues to evolve [57,58]. Despite this, some countries have been frequently recognized for their efficient handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Table 3 lists these countries along with their response measures, illustrating the variety of strategies different countries have implemented to manage the pandemic [56–65].

Common threads in these successful responses include early and decisive action, effective use of technology, transparent communication, and strong community engagement. These elements were instrumental in controlling case numbers and minimizing the overall impact on public health, the economy, and societal well-being [59–65]. Recognizing the dynamic nature of pandemics, the factors contributing to success or challenges can evolve over time. Moreover, the success of a country’s response should not be judged solely by the number of cases but also by the overall impact on public health, economic stability, and societal resilience. Public health experts continue to analyze and learn from various countries’ responses to better inform future pandemic preparedness and response efforts.

Global interconnectedness necessitates a collaborative approach to address global health threats. To manage pandemics effectively, it is essential to strengthen international health systems, enhance surveillance and response capabilities, and foster global cooperation. However, political and legal issues at both national and international levels may impede such collaborative efforts.

Political and legal influences and the impacts of leadership

It has become increasingly evident that leadership, especially political leadership, plays a crucial role in managing emergencies and pandemics [4,57,66]. A key factor in the public’s willingness to follow recommendations and adhere to restrictions is the level of trust between the population and their political leaders [66–71]. Information and communication technology has facilitated the faster dissemination of news than ever before. Consequently, accurate and timely communication and information sharing from political leaders are invaluable.

In addition, political leadership should respect scientific leadership as the frontline in combating emergencies and pandemics. It is essential to receive updated and accurate information from international authorities like the World Health Organization (WHO). Additionally, implementing coherent response strategies, restoring and extending a second line of preventive measures, maintaining a united front, and embracing the One Health concept, along with providing financial support for prevention and response at various levels, are all crucial [71–74]. The legal definition of pandemics, such as COVID-19, has become a topic of national discussion in several countries. Such changes may lead to stricter regulations concerning the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of the disease, as well as the implementation of preventive measures [48,73].

The impacts of national institutional infrastructure vary between high-income countries (HICs) and low and middle-income countries (LMICs), covering economic, social, political, and technological dimensions. It is crucial to recognize that these terms are generalizations that may oversimplify the intricate realities of individual countries. Furthermore, the classification of countries into the “LMIC” or “HIC” categories is determined by various criteria, including gross domestic product per capita, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and other indicators. Table 4 illustrates some of the differences between these nations [57,60,70,74,75].

It is important to approach these distinctions with nuance, acknowledging that countries exist on a spectrum influenced by governance, historical context, and cultural factors. Many countries are actively striving to transition from developing to developed status through various economic and social initiatives. These differences profoundly impact their capacity to manage pandemics, affecting healthcare infrastructure, governance, resource accessibility, and overall response capacity [74,75]. Table 5 summarizes some of the ways these differences influence pandemic management.

International collaboration, aid, and resource-sharing are crucial in addressing disparities. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure, public health systems, and ensuring equitable access to resources and vaccines can improve global pandemic management [4]. Supporting LMIC nations in building resilience requires a comprehensive approach, including socioeconomic, health, and governance systems [44,49,67]. Investment should focus on critical infrastructure like transportation, energy, water, and sanitation as well as enhancing digital infrastructure, healthcare facilities, and education. Emphasizing literacy, workforce development, and health education empowers communities, while educational programs on disaster preparedness and updated pandemic response plans are crucial.

Strengthening governance is crucial for effective decision-making, combating corruption, and enhancing transparency. Establishing robust social safety nets and targeted programs to reduce poverty and inequality are crucial for supporting vulnerable populations. Community involving in decision-making promotes initiatives tailored to local needs and encourages economic diversification [43,44]. Encouraging the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises, facilitating access to finance, and implementing strategies for adapting to climate change are key to building resilience. International collaboration provides critical financial aid, technical expertise, and knowledge sharing. Emphasizing research, development, and technological advancements is vital. Building resilience requires long-term commitment from governments, communities, and the international community to address vulnerabilities and develop adaptive systems.

Ethical and cultural dimensions of the pandemic

Addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by pandemics requires consideration of the ethical and cultural dimensions inherent in global health responses [76]. The pandemic’s global reach has highlighted significant inequities in healthcare access, emphasizing the urgent need for ethical frameworks that prioritize fairness and equitable distribution of resources and treatments across diverse populations [77]. Furthermore, the cultural sensitivity of public health measures is of paramount importance.

Strategies must be adaptable to the diverse cultural contexts in which they are implemented, respecting local customs, beliefs, and practices [78]. This approach not only ensures the effectiveness of these measures but also fosters trust and cooperation among communities, which are essential for the successful management and mitigation of pandemics. Engaging local leaders and stakeholders during the planning and implementation phases of public health initiatives can provide invaluable insights into culturally appropriate practices, thereby enhancing the acceptability of and adherence to interventions designed to curb the spread of disease [79]. Moving forward, integrating ethical considerations and cultural competence into pandemic preparedness and response strategies will help address current disparities and strengthen the resilience of health systems to face future global health crises.

How to prevent subsequent pandemics?

Preventing subsequent pandemics requires a multifaceted and coordinated approach that involves various sectors such as public health, research, policy, technology, and global cooperation. Figure 2 illustrates the available preventive strategies and measures that could help prevent future pandemics [4,5,80–87].

Preventing pandemics necessitates a sustained and collaborative effort on a global scale. Governments, international organizations, researchers, healthcare professionals, and the public each play essential roles in establishing a resilient and effective system for preventing, detecting, and responding to emerging infectious threats. Technological advancements have been pivotal in enhancing response strategies during recent pandemics. AI, data analytics, and digital health tools have become critical assets, significantly aiding in the management and prevention of pandemics by improving surveillance, early detection, response, research, and the ability to learn from past pandemics [88,89]. Below are some ways in which AI can be utilized in the context of pandemic management [81–83].

Early detection, surveillance, and diagnostic support

AI algorithms can analyze data from diverse sources, including social media, healthcare records, and environmental monitoring systems, to identify patterns and predict potential outbreaks before they become widespread [82]. These models are capable of forecasting the spread of infectious diseases, thereby assisting public health authorities in allocating resources and implementing targeted interventions effectively. Additionally, AI can simulate disease spread and model various scenarios, aiding policymakers in making well-informed decisions regarding interventions and resource distribution [85]. Machine learning algorithms utilize data from medical imaging, laboratory tests, and clinical symptoms to facilitate rapid and accurate diagnoses of infectious diseases. Furthermore, AI-powered chatbots can deliver real-time information, respond to inquiries, and provide preliminary screening for individuals concerned about their symptoms, thereby alleviating the pressure on healthcare hotlines.

Drug discovery, vaccine development, and supply chain management

AI can analyze existing drugs and identify potential candidates for repurposing to treat new or emerging diseases, thereby accelerating the drug development process. AI algorithms can also assist in the design of vaccines by predicting potential antigen structures and optimizing vaccine formulations [83,88]. Additionally, AI can optimize supply chain management by forecasting the demand for medical supplies and ensuring the timely production and distribution of essential resources, such as ventilators, masks, and vaccines.

Contact tracing, social distancing, monitoring, and surveillance

AI-powered contact tracing applications can identify and notify individuals potentially exposed to an infectious disease, facilitating targeted interventions and quarantine measures. AI technologies, including computer vision and machine learning, can monitor adherence to social distancing guidelines in public spaces. AI-powered telemedicine platforms and remote monitoring systems allow healthcare professionals to assess and monitor patients remotely, thereby reducing the risk of transmission in healthcare settings [80,90]. AI technologies can also analyze data from wildlife surveillance systems to monitor and predict potential disease spillover events. Additionally, AI can analyze environmental data to understand how factors like climate change and habitat destruction may contribute to the emergence of infectious diseases.

Public communication and education

AI-powered chatbots can distribute accurate information, analyze frequently asked questions, and guide the public, thereby helping to combat misinformation. AI can also analyze social media and news articles to assess public sentiment and address concerns in real time. AI systems must be designed with strong security measures to protect sensitive health data and to ensure compliance with privacy regulations [89]. Although AI presents significant opportunities in managing pandemics, it is vital to consider ethical issues, data privacy concerns, and to ensure that AI technologies are seamlessly integrated into existing public health frameworks to enhance collaboration and effectiveness. The development and deployment of AI tools must be carried out with transparency, accountability, and a commitment to addressing potential biases in the algorithms.

These technologies bolster current efforts to manage pandemics and provide important insights for future preparedness plans [91]. By incorporating these technological tools into public health strategies, we can improve global capabilities for predicting, preventing, and responding to pandemic threats.

How to implement scientific knowledge in practice?

Understanding the economic impacts of pandemics can guide policymakers in designing economic systems that are more resilient and capable of withstanding future health crises. Similarly, recognizing the role of environmental degradation in the emergence of pandemics underscores the importance of implementing sustainable practices and policies to prevent future outbreaks. Technologically, the critical role of digital health technologies and big data analytics in enhancing pandemic surveillance and response has been highlighted. Collectively, these transdisciplinary insights contribute to the global agenda of sustainable development by promoting health equity, enhancing preparedness, and fostering innovation in public health strategies.

Transdisciplinary teaching and cooperation extend beyond merely teaching across disciplines. They necessitate interdisciplinary collaboration to forge a cohesive relationship aimed at solving complex problems. This approach demands innovation, cooperation, and intentionality [92]. It should begin at the medical and public health school levels, incorporating major curriculum changes that are integrated with the foundational curriculum. Such contributions are essential for building a more resilient society, better prepared to manage future pandemics, and directly supporting several SDGs, including Good Health and Well-Being (SDG 3), Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG 11), and Climate Action (SDG 13) [11,17].

Global health database support

Creating data dashboard to track and analyze pandemic dynamics facilitates faster decision-making and improved forecasts. Handling these datasets requires a multidisciplinary team of experts [40,84]. Raw data often collected indirectly by various organizations and nations, necessitates different expertise levels for accurate interpretation.

A practical approach involves establishing central units to store, interpret, and utilize data scientifically. These units would continuously upgrade collection methodsand monitor key information to enhance the management of the pandemic and improve national health outcomes” [40,84]. Organizations like the Centers for Disease Control may monitor regions, critically assess pandemic planning, prevention, and management, and share vital information globally to prepare for future outbreaks [40].

This type of international or inter-organizational relationship requires an intelligence system capable of real-time analysis of critical and dynamic data, including the essential components of surge capacity: staff, stuff, space, and systems. Additionally, the demographics of daily confirmed cases and other relevant information contribute to creating an adaptive and predictive system. This system provides clear insights into the changes and dynamics of the pandemic, continuously offering a basis for decision-making, preemptive deployment of control measures, and forecasting. As a result, time, resources, and lives are effectively saved, and adjustments are made to accommodate the impacts of cultural differences, habits, and patterns of social and population mobility [40,84–86].

Nevertheless, such a system faces challenges including data privacy concerns, legal discrepancies across different jurisdictions, and political obstacles. These issues highlight the need for a robust framework managed by international organizations such as the WHO and the United Nations (UN). Moreover, collaboration at international, national, and regional levels is essential. As data are collected and analyzed locally and regionally, it is imperative to facilitate the transfer of this information to an international platform. Here, authorities like the WHO and the UN could oversee the ongoing influx of data, which is crucial for global decision-making. Even at the local level, interpreting data and understanding its implications necessitates a collaborative effort involving multiple agencies [48,68].

The Future of Pandemics

Predicting the future of pandemics is inherently uncertain, yet certain trends can be anticipated based on existing knowledge and ongoing advancements in science, technology, and global health [62–69]. The risk of new infectious agents, such as viruses and bacteria, crossing from animals to humans (zoonotic spillover) continues to be a significant concern. Factors including habitat destruction, wildlife trade, and climate change may contribute to these spillover events. Enhanced awareness and insights gained from recent pandemics, such as COVID-19, could enhance global preparedness and response mechanisms.

Understanding the impact of environmental changes and climate-related factors on the emergence and spread of infectious diseases is likely to receive increased attention. Strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental drivers of pandemics may become crucial to global health initiatives. Strengthened global governance structures and greater international cooperation in public health could prove indispensable. Collaborative efforts may be prioritized to address gaps in pandemic preparedness and response [2,18,40,61].

International collaboration and coordination in detecting and managing outbreaks are likely to become more robust. Enhanced surveillance systems and early warning mechanisms, which include the use of AI and big data analytics, could enable quicker detection of potential outbreaks, facilitating more rapid response efforts. The increasing integration of technology, such as telemedicine, remote monitoring, and digital contact tracing, is expected to become more prevalent in pandemic management. These technologies can assist in early detection, healthcare delivery, and public health interventions. A continued shift toward a “One Health” approach, recognizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, may inform strategies for preventing and managing pandemics [73,86].

Ongoing advancements in vaccine technologies, such as mRNA vaccines, may accelerate the development and deployment of vaccines against new infectious agents. Rapid vaccine development platforms could potentially shorten the timeline for vaccine availability. Efforts to ensure equitable access to vaccines and medical resources globally may become a focal point. Initiatives to address vaccine distribution disparities and increase vaccine production capacity in developing countries could play a crucial role. Building community resilience and promoting active participation in the pandemic response could be emphasized, and empowering communities with information and resources can contribute to more effective local responses [2,18,36,80].

War and disease have significantly shaped military history, yet they continue to be overlooked in countries such as the United States [88]. The combined impact of war and pandemics could potentially lead to more fatalities than a nuclear war, adding to the already severe consequences of conflict [93]. During the Vietnam War, few realized that the bubonic and pneumonic plagues, including their bubonic-septicemic and septicemic variants, were rampant. In many regions, the ongoing conflict halted not only hostilities but also vital commerce and access to medical services [94]. Throughout the peak years of the Vietnam War from 1964 to 1972, the majority of the world’s plague cases were of the bubonic type (Figure 3).

It is important to note that the future of pandemics will be influenced by the collective actions of the global community, scientific advancements, and societal responses to emerging challenges. Preparedness, adaptability, and a commitment to addressing the root causes of infectious diseases are crucial in determining the trajectory of pandemics in the coming years [95–97].

Recommendations

Based on this comprehensive review, we recommend some steps for the future management of pandemics based on different aspects of pandemic preparedness, response, and the role of technology and collaboration in these efforts. Table 6 shows these recommendations as major themes and their associated subcategories.

Conclusion

In the era of globalization, the interconnectedness of our world has yielded significant benefits, including economic growth and enhanced scientific collaboration. However, it has also presented unique challenges, especially in the rapid spread of infectious diseases, as vividly demonstrated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This review has explored the complexities of pandemics beyond their immediate health implications, examining their socioeconomic, environmental, and technological aspects. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust pandemic preparedness and response mechanisms that go beyond traditional healthcare infrastructure to address broader socioeconomic and environmental vulnerabilities.

Reflecting on the objectives outlined in the introduction, our review addresses a significant gap in the literature by offering a comprehensive analysis of pandemics from multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. The insights gained from this study enhance the growing body of knowledge that is crucial for strengthening global health defenses against pandemics. Importantly, our research emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and cross-sectoral partnerships in developing effective and inclusive strategies for pandemic response. These efforts are essential not only for the immediate management of pandemics but also for advancing the broader goals of sustainable development, which include promoting health equity, resilience, and environmental stewardship.

Our exploration highlights the necessity of an integrated approach to pandemic management, emphasizing effective surveillance, early detection, and coordinated international efforts alongside technological innovations like AI and telemedicine. These technologies enhance monitoring and response capabilities and promote equitable healthcare access, reducing disparities effecting marginalized communities, aligning SDG 3, SDG 11, and SDG 13.

Building on this alignment, our study advocates for a holistic approach, integrating health, environmental sustainability, and social equity to enhancesocietal resilience against future pandemics. Drawing lessons from past pandemics, including COVID-19, we gain valuable insights for improved preparation and response. By fostering collaboration, innovation, and sustainability, we can minimize future pandemics impacts, safeguard global well-being and advance toward a more resilient and equitable world.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Despite the profound historical impacts of pandemics on societies, economies, and public health, new pandemics are met with similar unpreparedness and confusion.

• Exploring the socioeconomic, environmental, and technological dimensions of contemporary pandemics is necessary to understand them comprehensively.

• Cross-disciplinary, transdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary approaches are necessary to integrate various perspectives to strengthen defenses against global health threats.

Article information

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Availability of Data

The datasets are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: AKM; Data curation: all authors; Formal analysis: all authors; Investigation: all authors; Methodology: AKM; Project administration: AKM; Resources: all authors; Supervision: FMB, KG; Validation: all authors; Visualization: all authors; Writing–original draft: AKM; Writing–review & editing: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Figure 1.

Common measures in the management of pandemics.

Figure 2.

Pillars in the prevention of pandemics.

Figure 3.

The impact of plague in Vietnam, combined with a chart from the World Health Organization. Reproduced from Plague cases reported in Asia to the World Health Organizations for the period 1954–1986. Other peaks in India, Tanzania, and Madagascar are also visible. Available from: https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/Timeline_of_plague.

References

• 1. Grennan D. What is a pandemic? JAMA 2019;321:910. ArticlePubMed
• 2. Morens DM, Daszak P, Markel H, et al. Pandemic COVID-19 joins history’s pandemic legion. mBio 2020;11:e00812−20.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 3. Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. What is a pandemic? J Infect Dis 2009;200:1018−21.ArticlePubMed
• 4. Khorram-Manesh A, Goniewicz K, Burkle FM. Unleashing the global potential of public health: a framework for future pandemic response. J Infect Public Health 2024;17:82−95.Article
• 5. Goniewicz K, Khorram-Manesh A, Burkle FM, et al. The European Union’s post-pandemic strategies for public health, economic recovery, and social resilience. Glob Transit 2023;5:201−9.Article
• 6. Bavel JJ, Baicker K, Boggio PS, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav 2020;4:460−71.PubMed
• 7. Checa-Ros A, Munoz-Hoyos A, Molina-Carballo A, et al. Analysis of different melatonin secretion patterns in children with sleep disorders: melatonin secretion patterns in children. J Child Neurol 2017;32:1000−8.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 8. Choudhry AA, Shahzeen F, Choudhry SA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 infection on quality of sleep. Cureus 2021;13:e18182.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 9. Molina-Carballo A, Palacios-Lopez R, Jerez-Calero A, et al. Protective effect of melatonin administration against SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2021;44:31−45.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 10. Briggs A. Climate change, conflict, and contagion: emerging threats to global public health. Edited by Emel Önal A: Healthcare access: new threats, new approaches. IntechOpen; 2023. pp 21−52.
• 11. Khorram-Manesh A. Global transition, global risks, and the UN’s sustainable development goals: a call for peace, justice, and political stability. Glob Transit 2023;5:90−7.Article
• 12. AlKnawy B, Kozlakidis Z, Tarkoma S, et al. Digital public health leadership in the global fight for health security. BMJ Glob Health 2023;8:e011454.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 13. Zhu B, Nosaka N, Kanamaru S, et al. Rapid and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 detection using a homogeneous fluorescent immunosensor Quenchbody with crowding agents. Analyst 2022;147:4971−9.ArticlePubMed
• 14. Kumar A, Gupta PK, Srivastava A. A review of modern technologies for tackling COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020;14:569−73.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 15. Anton P, Munoz A, Mana A, et al. Security-enhanced ambient assisted living supporting school activities during hospitalisation. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 2012;3:177−92.ArticlePDF
• 16. Smith MJ, Ahmad A, Arawi T, et al. Top five ethical lessons of COVID-19 that the world must learn. Wellcome Open Res 2021;6:17. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 17. Yeoh K, Wu Y, Chakraborty S, et al. Global health system resilience during encounters with stressors: lessons learnt from cancer services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023;35:e289−300.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 18. Jowell A, Barry M. COVID-19: a matter of planetary, not only national health. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;103:31−2.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 19. Madhav N, Oppenheim B, Gallivan M, et al. Pandemics: risks, impacts, and mitigation. Edited by Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, et al.: Disease control priorities: improving health and reducing poverty. 3rd ed. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017. pp e11−13.
• 20. Nunes MC, Thommes E, Frohlich H, et al. Redefining pandemic preparedness: multidisciplinary insights from the CERP modelling workshop in infectious diseases, workshop report. Infect Dis Model 2024;9:501−18.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 21. Sukhera J. Narrative reviews in medical education: key steps for researchers. J Grad Med Educ 2022;14:418−9.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 22. George T. What is action research?: definition and examples [Internet]. Scribbr; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/action-research/.
• 23. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Asses Res Eval 2000;7:17.
• 24. Daszak P. Anatomy of a pandemic. Lancet 2012;380:1883−4.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 25. Fears JR. The plague under Marcus Aurelius and the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2004;18:65−77.ArticlePubMed
• 26. Barbieri R, Signoli M, Cheve D, et al. Yersinia pestis: the natural history of plague. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020;34:e00044−19.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 27. Glatter KA, Finkelman P. History of the plague: an ancient pandemic for the age of COVID-19. Am J Med 2021;134:176−81.ArticlePubMed
• 28. Evans RJ. Epidemics and revolutions: cholera in nineteenth-century Europe. Past Present 1988;120:123−46.Article
• 29. Tomes N. “Destroyer and teacher”: managing the masses during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. Public Health Rep 2010;125(Suppl 3). 48−62.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 30. Honigsbaum M. Revisiting the 1957 and 1968 influenza pandemics. Lancet 2020;395:1824−6.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 31. Bekker LG, Beyrer C, Mgodi N, et al. HIV infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023;9:42. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 32. Girard MP, Tam JS, Assossou OM, et al. The 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus pandemic: a review. Vaccine 2010;28:4895−902.ArticlePubMed
• 33. Msemburi W, Karlinsky A, Knutson V, et al. The WHO estimates of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature 2023;613:130−7.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 34. Mayer JD, Schintler LA, Bledsoe S. Culture, freedom, and the spread of COVID‐19: do some societies and political systems have national anti‐bodies? World Med Health Policy 2020;12:498−511.ArticlePDF
• 35. Sandmann FG, Davies NG, Vassall A, et al. The potential health and economic value of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alongside physical distancing in the UK: a transmission model-based future scenario analysis and economic evaluation. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:962−74.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 36. Coccia M. Sources, diffusion and prediction in COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned to face next health emergency. AIMS Public Health 2023;10:145−68.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 37. Yousif MG, Hashim K, Rawaf S. Post COVID-19 effect on medical staff and doctors’ productivity analysed by machine learning. Baghdad Sci J 2023;20(4 (SI)). 1507. ArticlePDF
• 38. Doleman G, De Leo A, Bloxsome D. The impact of pandemics on healthcare providers' workloads: a scoping review. J Adv Nurs 2023;79:4434−54.ArticlePubMed
• 39. Schepers M, Schmidtmann I, Zahn D, et al. Medical appointments and provision of medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mainz, Germany. PLoS One 2023;18:e0280292.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 40. Romiti GF, Bencivenga L, Villani R, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on well-being of Italian physicians: a report from the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI) national survey. Intern Emerg Med 2023;18:53−65.PubMed
• 41. Ferrara F, Zovi A, Masi M, et al. Long COVID could become a widespread post-pandemic disease?: a debate on the organs most affected. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2023;396:1583−9.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 42. Saxon L, Fazio TN, Gumm K, et al. Quality of care was not compromised during the COVID-19 pandemic at a level 1 trauma centre. ANZ J Surg 2022;92:172−9.PubMed
• 43. Phattharapornjaroen P, Carlstrom E, Sivarak O, et al. Community-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic: case study of a home isolation centre using flexible surge capacity. Public Health 2022;211:29−36.ArticlePubMed
• 44. Khorram-Manesh A. Flexible surge capacity: public health, public education, and disaster management. Health Promot Perspect 2020;10:175−9.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 45. Willey JM, Olvet DM, Bird JB, et al. Pandemics past and present: a guided inquiry approach. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2020;7:2382120520976957. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 46. Althwanay A, Ahsan F, Oliveri F, et al. Medical education, pre- and post-pandemic era: a review article. Cureus 2020;12:e10775.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 47. Sultan MA, Carlstrom E, Sorensen JL, et al. Incorporating simulation exercises using collaborative tools into disaster and emergency medicine curriculum: a pilot survey among Saudi Arabian professionals. J Contin Crisis Manag 2023;31:905−12.Article
• 48. Khorram-Manesh A, Dulebenets MA, Goniewicz K. Implementing public health strategies: the need for educational initiatives: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:5888. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 49. Talic S, Shah S, Wild H, et al. Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and COVID-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2021;375:e068302.ArticlePubMed
• 50. Hu CY, Tang YW, Su QM, et al. Public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic reduce the spread of other respiratory infectious diseases. Front Public Health 2021;9:771638. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 51. World Health Organization (WHO) (CH), United Nations Children's Fund (‎UNICEF)‎. Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19: technical brief, 3 March 2020 [Internet]. WHO; 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/331305.
• 52. Igarashi A, Nakano Y, Yoneyama-Hirozane M. Public preferences and willingness to accept a hypothetical vaccine to prevent a pandemic in Japan: a conjoint analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022;21:241−8.ArticlePubMed
• 53. Ligo VA, Chang CM, Yi H. Contested solidarity and vulnerability in social media-based public responses to COVID-19 policies of mobility restrictions in Singapore: a qualitative analysis of temporal evolution. BMC Public Health 2021;21:2232. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 54. Lee M, You M. Avoidance of healthcare utilization in South Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:4363. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 55. Dai J, Lyu F, Yu L, et al. Temporal and emotional variations in people’s perceptions of mass epidemic infectious disease after the COVID-19 pandemic using influenza A as an example: topic modeling and sentiment analysis based on Weibo data. J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e49300.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 56. Van Scoy LJ, Miller EL, Snyder B, et al. Knowledge, perceptions, and preferred information sources related to COVID-19 among central Pennsylvania adults early in the pandemic: a mixed methods cross-sectional survey. Ann Fam Med 2021;19:293−301.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 57. Khorram-Manesh A, Carlstrom E, Hertelendy AJ, et al. Does the prosperity of a country play a role in COVID-19 outcomes? Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2022;16:177−86.ArticlePubMed
• 58. Antras P, Redding SJ, Rossi-Hansberg E. Globalization and pandemics. Am Econ Rev 2023;113:939−81.Article
• 59. Bilinski A, Thompson K, Emanuel E. COVID-19 and excess all-cause mortality in the US and 20 comparison countries, June 2021-March 2022. JAMA 2023;329:92−4.ArticlePubMed
• 60. Worldometer (CH). COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic [Internet]. Worldometer; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
• 61. Ministry of Health (NZ). COVID-19 (novel coronavirus) [Internet]. Ministry of Health; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus.
• 62. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (TW). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [Internet]. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov.tw/en/Disease/SubIndex/.
• 63. Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care (AU). Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: find information about the 2019 to 2023 COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/health-alerts/covid-19.
• 64. World Health Organization (WHO) (CH). COVID-19 in Viet Nam [Internet]. WHO; 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/vietnam/emergencies/covid-19-in-vietnam.
• 65. Lim S, Sohn M. How to cope with emerging viral diseases: lessons from South Korea’s strategy for COVID-19, and collateral damage to cardiometabolic health. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2023;30:100581. ArticlePubMed
• 66. Papadimos TJ, Soghoian SE, Nanayakkara P, et al. COVID-19 blind spots: a consensus statement on the importance of competent political leadership and the need for public health cognizance. J Glob Infect Dis 2020;12:167−90.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 67. Hall PA, Sheeran P, Fong GT, et al. Biobehavioral aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Psychosom Med 2021;83:309−21.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 68. Ohmagari N. Social implications of a change in the legal classification of COVID-19: the need for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and healthcare system strengthening. Glob Health Med 2023;5:75−7.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 69. Haberer JE, van der Straten A, Safren SA, et al. Individual health behaviours to combat the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from HIV socio-behavioural science. J Int AIDS Soc 2021;24:e25771.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 70. World Health Organization (WHO) (CH). WHO COVID-19 dashboard [Internet]. WHO; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c.
• 71. Baker MG, Durrheim D, Hsu LY, et al. COVID-19 and other pandemics require a coherent response strategy. Lancet 2023;401:265−6.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 72. Whitty CJ, Smith G, McBride M, et al. Restoring and extending secondary prevention. BMJ 2023;380:201. ArticlePubMed
• 73. Lefrancois T, Malvy D, Atlani-Duault L, et al. After 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, translating One Health into action is urgent. Lancet 2023;401:789−94.ArticlePubMed
• 74. Global Burden of Disease 2021 Health Financing Collaborator Network. Global investments in pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: development assistance and domestic spending on health between 1990 and 2026. Lancet Glob Health 2023;11:e385−413.PubMedPMC
• 75. Roelen K, Ackley C, Boyce P, et al. COVID-19 in LMICs: the need to place stigma front and centre to its response. Eur J Dev Res 2020;32:1592−612.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 76. Bennett B, Carney T. Law, ethics and pandemic preparedness: the importance of cross-jurisdictional and cross-cultural perspectives. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010;34:106−12.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 77. Johnson SB, Lucivero F, Zimmermann BM, et al. Ethical reasoning during a pandemic: results of a five country European study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2022;13:67−78.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 78. Sanchez-Bautista C, Reyes Gomez L, Mojica Gomez LC, et al. Teaching experiences in contexts of conflict and cultural diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of a public school in Bogota. Educ Confl Rev 2023;4:73−80.
• 79. Goniewicz K, Burkle FM, Hall TF, et al. Global public health leadership: the vital element in managing global health crises. J Glob Health 2022;12:03003. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 80. Donelle L, Comer L, Hiebert B, et al. Use of digital technologies for public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Digit Health 2023;9:20552076231173220. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 81. Leslie D. Tackling COVID-19 through responsible AI innovation: five steps in the right direction. Harvard Data Sci Rev 2020;10:1−73.Article
• 82. MacIntyre CR, Chen X, Kunasekaran M, et al. Artificial intelligence in public health: the potential of epidemic early warning systems. J Int Med Res 2023;51:3000605231159335. ArticlePubMedPDF
• 83. Kumar A, Mani V, Jain V, et al. Managing healthcare supply chain through artificial intelligence (AI): a study of critical success factors. Comput Ind Eng 2023;175:108815. ArticlePubMed
• 84. Burkle FM, Bradt DA, Ryan BJ. Global public health database support to population-based management of pandemics and global public health crises, part I: the concept. Prehosp Disaster Med 2021;36:95−104.ArticlePubMed
• 85. Barouki R, Kogevinas M, Audouze K, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: emerging research needs. Environ Int 2021;146:106272. ArticlePubMed
• 86. Kinsella CM, Santos PD, Postigo-Hidalgo I, et al. Preparedness needs research: how fundamental science and international collaboration accelerated the response to COVID-19. PLoS Pathog 2020;16:e1008902.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 87. Spirtas M, Webber S. The future and past of war and disease [Internet]. Rand; 2022 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2022/01/the-future-and-past-of-war-and-disease.html.
• 88. Hatamlah H, Allan M, Abu-AlSondos I, et al. The role of artificial intelligence in supply chain analytics during the pandemic. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 2023;11:1175−86.Article
• 89. El-Haddadeh R, Fadlalla A, Hindi NM. Is there a place for responsible artificial intelligence in pandemics?: a tale of two countries. Inform Sys Front 2023;25:2221−37.ArticlePDF
• 90. Mehraeen E, SeyedAlinaghi S, Heydari M, et al. Telemedicine technologies and applications in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2023;29:14604582231167431. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 91. Johinke R, Cummings R, Di Lauro F. Reclaiming the technology of higher education for teaching digital writing in a post: pandemic world. J Uni Teach Learn Pract 2023;20:1. ArticlePDF
• 92. Hirsch A. Transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches [Internet]. Northern Illinois University, Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning; 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. Available from: https://citl.news.niu.edu/2020/11/17/transdisciplinary-interdisciplinary/.
• 93. Carta MG, Orru G, Barberini L. War and pandemic: a negative synergism could amplify the catastrophe. J Public Health Res 2022;11:3016. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 94. Burkle FM. Plague as seen in South Vietnamese children: a chronicle of observations and treatment under adverse conditions. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1973;12:291−8.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 95. Patterson GE, McIntyre KM, Clough HE, et al. Societal impacts of pandemics: comparing COVID-19 with history to focus our response. Front Public Health 2021;9:630449. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 96. Alami H, Lehoux P, Fleet R, et al. How can health systems better prepare for the next pandemic?: lessons learned from the management of COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada). Front Public Health 2021;9:671833. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 97. Destoumieux-Garzon D, Matthies-Wiesler F, Bierne N, et al. Getting out of crises: environmental, social-ecological and evolutionary research is needed to avoid future risks of pandemics. Environ Int 2022;158:106915. ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Transforming global public health: Climate collaboration, political challenges, and systemic change
  Krzysztof Goniewicz, Frederick M. Burkle, Amir Khorram-Manesh
  Journal of Infection and Public Health.2025; 18(1): 102615.     CrossRef
• The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predicting and combating antimicrobial resistance
  Hazrat Bilal, Muhammad Nadeem Khan, Sabir Khan, Muhammad Shafiq, Wenjie Fang, Rahat Ullah Khan, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Xiaohui Li, Qiao-Li Lv, Bin Xu
  Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.2025; 27: 423.     CrossRef
• Innovative Diagnostic Approaches and Challenges in the Management of HIV: Bridging Basic Science and Clinical Practice
  Mohd Afzal, Shagun Agarwal, Rabab H. Elshaikh, Asaad M. A. Babker, Einas Awad Ibrahim Osman, Ranjay Kumar Choudhary, Suresh Jaiswal, Farhana Zahir, Pranav Kumar Prabhakar, Anass M. Abbas, Manar G. Shalabi, Ashok Kumar Sah
  Life.2025; 15(2): 209.     CrossRef
• BIOSURFACTANT PROPERTIES AND ITS APPLICATION IN CHROMIUM REMOVAL: A REVIEW
  Usman Ali Bukar, Abdullahi Hassan Kawo, Sani Yahaya, Sani Yahaya, Abdullahi Balarabe Inuwa, Aminu Yusuf Fardami
  FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES.2025; 9(1): 273.     CrossRef
• Shaping Safety: Unveiling the Dynamics of Incident Reporting and Safety Culture in Saudi Arabian Healthcare
  Hind Alsahli, Ahmed Al-Wathinani, Tariq Althobaiti, Mohammed Abahussain, Krzysztof Goniewicz
  Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2024; Volume 17: 3775.     CrossRef
• The Impacts of Narcissistic Leadership on Achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals—A Scoping Review
  Amir Khorram-Manesh, Krzysztof Goniewicz, Frederick M. Burkle
  Challenges.2024; 15(3): 37.     CrossRef
• Global Health Emergencies of Extreme Drought Events: Historical Impacts and Future Preparedness
  Zakaria A. Mani, Amir Khorram-Manesh, Krzysztof Goniewicz
  Atmosphere.2024; 15(9): 1137.     CrossRef
• The Effectiveness and Benefits of Disaster Simulation Training for Undergraduate Medical Students in Saudi Arabia [Letter]
  Ahmed Al-Wathinani, Krzysztof Goniewicz
  Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2024; Volume 15: 1173.     CrossRef
• Evaluating the efficacy of full-scale and tabletop exercises in enhancing paramedic preparedness for external disasters: A quasi-experimental study
  Ghadeer A. Alakrawi, Ahmed M. Al-Wathinani, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Abdullah M. Alobaid, Mohammed Abahussian, Riyadh Alhazmi, Abdulmajeed Mobrad, Albaraa Jebreel, Saqar Althunayyan, Krzysztof Goniewicz
  Medicine.2024; 103(49): e40777.     CrossRef