Introduction

A stroke is a serious condition that occurs when the blood supply to the brain is either blocked causing sudden ischemia, or when there has been a hemorrhage of blood vessels, causing partial loss of brain function that leads to functional disability [1]. Some of the common symptoms of a stroke include loss of function of the upper limbs due to weakened muscles and sensory changes, difficulty in trunk control, unstable balance and gait, and inability to perform basic daily activities [2]. Of these symptoms, the inability to perform daily activities deteriorates the patients’ level of independence in their daily routines and increases their dependence on others, which may lead to loss of self-esteem and depression, resulting in a comprehensive decline in quality of life.

Basic daily activities are highly likely to include activities that require the simultaneous performance of 2 or more actions or functional tasks [3]. However, if a person with impaired cognitive or physical function, such as a stroke patient, performs 2 or more tasks at once, he or she may experience dual-task interference, where it is difficult for the patient to concentrate. As a result, their ability to perform daily activities that require at least 2 tasks will generally deteriorate [4].

Dual-task training is a practical interventional method for actual daily activities of a patient beyond the clinic, that helps to reduce dual-task interference. Generally, dual-task training refers to performing 1 task whilst being engaged in another, or performing 2 or more tasks simultaneously [5].

Many studies of stroke patients use dual-task training programs combining activities that require walking, balancing, trunk control, and upper limb function [5–7] to demonstrate efficacy, however, there are limited analyses of improved performance in daily activities. In fact, this may be the most important area for patient upper limb function and rehabilitation. Therefore, this study applied dual task training to chronic stroke patients to examine the effects of the training on their upper limb functions and daily activities.

Materials and Methods

1. Participants

Prior to participation, all patients were instructed of the purpose of this study before requesting informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Of the stroke patients who had been admitted into Hospital A in South Korea under occupational therapy care, 21 patients understood and provided their consent to participate in the study. The selection criteria included patients with diagnosis of hemiplegia induced by a stroke which has occurred at least 6 months from the initial onset, and had a score of at least 20 on the Mini Mental State Examination-Korean [indicating the capability to follow the instructions of the researcher, capability of independent walking for 5 minutes at a comfortable pace, and the absence of neurological or orthopedic diseases other than stroke (Table 1)]. Patients who were undergoing medicinal treatment to reduce spasticity were not included in the study.

2. Procedure and measurement

This study used a single group pre-test post-test design. To select the patients, their general information was checked alongside medical records. The effects of dual-task training in patients in the pre-study were examined using the BBT (box and block test, as an assessment tool for the patients’ upper limb functions) and the K-MBI (Korea-modified Barthel index, to measure their capabilities of performing daily activities) assessment tools. Dual-task training was performed for 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks, 30 minutes per session was used as the intervention program for this study. After completing the 4-week intervention program, the BBT and K-MBI were conducted as a post-study in the same manner as the pre-study. As a standardized tool to assess the agility of the upper limbs, the BBT assessed the number of wooden blocks the patients could move within a minute. The test-retest reliability of this tool was 0.93 for the left hand and 0.97 for the right hand, and the inter-tester reliability was 0.99 for the left hand and 1.00 for the right hand [8]. The Barthel index was revised and supplemented by Granger et al [9] in 1979, leading to the assessment tool known as K-MBI which is sensitive to changes in the capabilities of performing daily activities. It had a test-retest inter-test reliability of 0.89 and 0.95, respectively [9]. The K-MBI test consists of 10 questions, and the score is out of 100 points. A score of between 0–24 indicates total dependence, 25–49 maximal dependence, 50–74 partial dependence, 75–90 slight dependence, 91–99 minimal dependence, and 100 total independence.

The applied individual program for upper limbs consisted of 3 tasks proposed by Schaefer et al [10]: moving beans with a spoon, classifying wooden blocks by color, and opening bottle caps. All activities were performed by the patient standing on a sissel sitfit (CH 8904 Aesch, Switzerland) air cushion with a diameter of 33 cm exposed to an unstable bearing surface. To assist the patients in their understanding, the therapists provided demonstrations and explanations prior to the patients’ performance of the study activities. When the patients expressed their full understanding in the training process, the dual-task training was started. The individual training tasks were randomly selected for implementation, and a break time was given to relieve patients’ fatigue during training.

3. Statistical analysis

PASW 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis of this study. Technical statistics were used to analyze the general properties of the patients, and paired samples t test was conducted after confirming a normal distribution through a test of normality (Shapiro-Wilk) on the patients to measure the changes in their capacity to perform daily activities and upper limb functions before and after the intervention.

Results

Table 2 shows the patients’ upper limb function and capability of performing daily activities before and after the intervention in this study. Firstly, patients’ upper limb function statistically significantly improved (p < 0.05), with the average BBT increasing from 21.88 points before the dual-task training intervention to 26.22 points after the intervention. In terms of the capability of performing daily activities, the mean K-MBI increased from 64.82 points before the intervention, to 67.29 points after the intervention (p < 0.05). These results showed statistically significant changes not only in the upper limb functions but also in the capability of performing daily activities (p < 0.05).

Discussion

An important thing to note is that improvement due to interventional training for stroke patients shown in the therapy room are retained in their daily lives. Filiatrault et al [11] reported that the sustained therapeutic effects from clinic to home depended on the similarities of the 2 tasks performed, or similarity of the 2 different environments. In other words, the more the training environment and practical environment were similar, the better the learning or therapeutic effects were transferred. Dual-task training differs from the simple task training conducted in clinical studies of stroke patients, to more closely resemble the patients’ daily routines, which require the simultaneous performance of various tasks. In this respect, this study applied dual task training, which resembles actual daily tasks to chronic stroke patients, to examine the therapeutic effects on upper limb function and performance of daily activities. As a result, statistically significant effects of the dual-task training were observed in chronic stroke patients’ upper limb function and capability of performing daily tasks (p < 0.05). These results signify the positive effects of dual-task training on upper limb function and performance of daily activities of chronic stroke patients, in addition to the positive effects on the walking ability, trunk control, and balancing of stroke patients that have been reported in many preceding studies [5–7]. Generally, the purpose of physical therapy following a stroke, is to maximally recover from the functional loss, reduce dependence upon others in daily activities, and assist in resuming their social roles. Of these outcomes, enhancing the ability to perform daily activities is arguably the most important objective to achieve the goal of helping stroke patients recover their normal lives [11–13].

In addition, a previous study noted that if there was no meaningful functional transition for the daily life activities, even if there was a quality improvement in the upper limb function, the upper limb function could not be regarded as having been improved, and an improvement of upper limb function in stroke patients would be closely related to their improvement in daily life performance [14]. It was confirmed that dual-task training could have a positive effect not only on the upper limb function of the patients, but also on the daily life performance ability, which is the end goal of rehabilitation, and this study has a significant meaning in this regard. The limitations of this study include the difficulty in applying its findings to all stroke patients, as it was conducted on a small number of patients, without a control group in the study design.

Article information

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

• 1. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, et al. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43(2). 171−84. PMID: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076. PMID: 16847784.ArticlePubMed
• 2. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil 2006;20(5). 451−8. PMID: 10.1191/0269215505cr955oa. PMID: 16774097.ArticlePubMed
• 3. Bowen A, Wenman R, Mickelborough J, et al. Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. Age Ageing 2001;30(4). 319−23. PMID: 10.1093/ageing/30.4.319. PMID: 11509310.ArticlePubMedPDF
• 4. Regnaux JP, David D, Daniel O, et al. Evidence for cognitive processes involved in the control of steady state of walking in healthy subjects and after cerebral damage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19(2). 125−32. PMID: 10.1177/1545968305275612. PMID: 15883356.ArticlePubMed
• 5. Pellecchia GL. Dual-task training reduces impact of cognitive task on postural sway. J Mot Behav 2005;37(3). 239−46. PMID: 10.3200/JMBR.37.3.239-246. PMID: 15883121.ArticlePubMed
• 6. Silsupadol P, Lugade V, Shumway-Cook A, et al. Training-related chages in dual-task walking performance of elderly persons with balance impairment: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture 2009;29(4). 634−9. PMID: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.01.006. PMID: 19201610. PMID: 2707497.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 7. Bensoussan L, Viton JM, Schieppati M, et al. Changes in postural control in hemiplegic patients after stroke performing a dual task. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(8). 1009−15. PMID: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.009. PMID: 17678663.ArticlePubMed
• 8. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, et al. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norma studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(7). 751−5. PMID: 8024419.ArticlePubMed
• 9. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42(8). 703−9. PMID: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6. PMID: 2760661.ArticlePubMed
• 10. Schaefer SY, Patterson CB, Lang CE. Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: Implications for task-specific approaches to upper-extremity neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27(7). 602−12. PMID: 10.1177/1545968313481279. PMID: 23549521. PMID: 3769167.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 11. Filiatrault J, Arsenault AB, Dutil E, Bourbonnais D. Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45(9). 806−10. PMID: 10.5014/ajot.45.9.806. PMID: 1928288.ArticlePubMed
• 12. Alain L, Helene P, Sylvie N. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke: changes in clinical and laboratory measures of balance and mobility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85(10). 820−30. PMID: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233179.64769.8c.ArticlePubMed
• 13. Sansonetti D, Hoffmann T. Cognitive assessment across the continuum of care: The importance of occupational performance-based assessment for individuals post-stroke and traumatic brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J 2013;60(5). 334−42. PMID: 24089985.ArticlePubMed
• 14. Kim S-H, Chang M-Y, Kwon H-C. The Effect of Involved Upper Extremity’s Motor Function Recovery on Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Hemiplegia. J Korean Soc Occup Ther 2003;11(2). 65−75.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• The Relationship Between Dual-Task Performance and Functional Independence in Stroke Patients
  Pınar OBA, Musa POLAT
  Turkish Journal of Science and Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• İnme Hastalarında Çift Yönlü Görev Aktivitesinin Etkinliği
  Derya Tuba BAL, Tuba KOCA, Ejder BERK, Burhan Fatih KOÇYİĞİT, Vedat NACİTARHAN
  Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültes.2020; 15(3): 60.     CrossRef