• Home
  • E-submission
  • Sitemap
  • Contact us
  • Search
  • Advanced Search
Osong Public Health Res Perspect Search

CLOSE

Osong Public Health Res Perspect > Volume 9(5); 2018 > Article
Kim and Hyun: Corrigendum to “Associations between Social and Physical Environments, and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions”[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1):16–24]

Corrigendum

Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 2018; 9(5): 283-285.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.11

Corrigendum to “Associations between Social and Physical Environments, and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions”[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1):16–24]

Bongjeong Kima, Hye Sun Hyunb,*

aDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea

bDepartment of Nursing, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Korea

*Corresponding author: Hye Sun Hyun, Department of Nursing, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Korea, E-mail: hshyun76@gmail.com

Copyright ©2018, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/):

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
The authors regret to report that in the original paper [1], the OR and 95% CI values of the individual level variables in Table 4 are missing. Furthermore, the OR values and 95% CI values of individual and community level variables are missing or incorrectly presented in Table 5.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 4
Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; urban.
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95%CI OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Fixed effect
Individual level
 Gender Male (ref)
Female 0.675 0.653–0.696 0.675 0.653–0.697
 Age (y) 19–34 (ref)
35–49 1.033 0.988–1.081 1.033 0.988–1.080
50–64 1.295 1.299–1.364 1.295 1.229–1.364
 Marital status Living with spouse (ref)
Divorced, and bereaved 1.086 1.028–1.147 1.086 1.028–1.363
Single 1.377 1.314–1.443 1.376 1.313–1.442
 Education Uneducated (ref)
Elementary school 1.019 0.861–1.205 1.019 0.861–1.206
Middle school 1.004 0.846–1.190 1.004 0.847–1.191
High school 0.963 0.813–1.142 0.965 0.814–1.144
≥College/University 1.042 0.874–1.242 1.044 0.876–1.244
 Job Non-manual (ref)
Manual 1.077 1.034–1.121 1.078 1.035–1.122
Housewife, unemployed 1.022 0.985–1.059 1.022 0.985–1.059
 Household income / monthly <100 1.129 1.041–1.224 1.129 1.040–1.224
100–200 1.075 0.993–1.164 1.075 0.993–1.164
201–300 1.171 1.081–1.268 1.170 1.080–1.267
301–400 1.176 1.088–1.269 1.175 1.088–1.268
≥401(ref)
 Self-rated health Poor (ref)
Neither good nor 1.098 1.059–1.138 1.097 1.059–1.138
Very good 1.217 1.169–1.267 1.217 1.169–1.266
 No. of Chronic diseases 0 (ref)
1 1.040 0.995–1.086 1.040 0.995–1.086
≥2 0.916 0.865–0.969 0.916 0.865–0.969
 BMI Obesity 0.974 0.939–1.009 0.974 0.939–1.009
Community level
 Satisfaction with safety 1.362 0.256–5.941
 Satisfaction with natural environment 0.446 0.159–1.378
 Satisfaction with living environment 2.596 0.382–17.314
 Satisfaction with public transportation 2.829 1.001–7.223
 Satisfaction with health service 0.927 0.357–2.288
 Social cohesion 0.660 0.308–1.477
 Social networks 0.969 0.876–1.072
 Social activity participation 2.534 0.768–14.318
 Presence of cycle paths (ref=no) 0.993 0.815–1.148
 Number of exercise facilities 1.001 0.996–1.001
 Number of sports park 0.978 0.960–0.995
 Number of hiking trails 0.994 0.989–0.999
Community level random effect
 Between community variance (SE) 0.1389(0.026) 0.1406(0.027) 0.0938(0.022)
 ICC 0.040 0.040 0.028
Statistics for the model fit
 Log likelihood −53990.092 −50962.909 −50943.399
 Likelihood-ratio test
 χ2 (p) 2198.89(<.001) 2074.46 (<.001) 1339.29(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

Table 5
Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; rural.
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95%CI OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Fixed effect
Individual level
 Gender Male (ref)
Female 0.728 0.696–0.760 0.728 0.696–0.760
 Age (y) 19–34 (ref)
35–49 1.102 1.026–1.184 1.102 1.025–1.183
50–64 1.310 1.207–1.422 1.309 1.206–1.420
 Marital status Living with spouse (ref)
Divorced, and bereaved 1.030 0.962–1.104 1.031 0.963–1.104
Single 1.162 1.080–1.251 1.161 1.079–1.250
 Education Uneducated (ref)
Elementary school 1.019 0.861–1.205 1.019 0.861–1.206
Middle school 1.004 0.846–1.190 1.004 0.847–1.191
High school 0.963 0.813–1.142 0.965 0.814–1.144
≥College/University 1.042 0.874–1.242 1.044 0.876–1.244
 Job Non-manual (ref)
Manual 1.379 1.310–1.452 1.377 1.307–1.450
Housewife, unemployed 0.854 0.806–0.905 0.855 0.807–0.905
 Household income / monthly <100 1.070 1.001–1.163 1.079 1.001–1.164
100–200 1.155 1.069–1.247 1.156 1.070–1.249
201–300 1.147 1.057–1.245 1.149 1.059–1.248
301–400 1.178 1.090–1.273 1.091 1.101–1.274
≥401(ref)
 Self-rated health Poor (ref)
Neither good nor 1.058 1.007–1.111 1.058 1.007–1.111
Very good 1.175 1.115–1.237 1.174 1.114–1.236
 No. of Chronic diseases 0 (ref)
1 1.091 1.033–1.152 1.091 1.033–1.152
≥2 1.012 0.947–1.082 1.012 0.947–1.082
 BMI Obesity 0.985 0.941–1.031 0.985 0.941–1.031
Community level
 Satisfaction with safety 0.047 0.003–0.867
 Satisfaction with natural environment 4.404 0.741–26.156
 Satisfaction with living environment 0.277 0.061–1.253
 Satisfaction with public transportation 2.604 0.781–8.680
 Satisfaction with health service 1.728 0.592–5.039
 Social cohesion 4.693 1.216–18.114
 Social networks 1.023 0.913–1.158
 Social activity participation 0.515 0.203–1.303
 Presence of cycle paths (ref=no) 1.328 1.007–1.751
 Number of exercise facilities 0.997 0.994–1.001
 Number of sports park 1.026 1.001–1.058
 Number of hiking trails 1.025 1.006–1.044
Community level random effect
 Between community variance (SE) 0.1695(0.033) 0.1627(0.032) 0.1123(0.027)
 ICC 0.049 0.047 0.033
Statistics for the model fit
 Log likelihood −30539.61 −27952.831 −27937.739
 Likelihood-ratio test
 χ2 (p) 1472.76(<.001) 1261.70(<.001) 882.40(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

Notes

DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.1.04.

Reference

1. Kim BJ, Hyun HS. Associations between Social and Physical Environments,and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1):16-24.
crossref pdf
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 573 View
  • 6 Download
Related articles in
Osong Public Health Res Perspect

Corrigendum to “Traditional and Modern Cell Culture in Virus Diagnosis”[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2016;7(2):77–82]2020 August;11(4)

Corrigendum to “Coronavirus Disease-19: The First 7,755 Cases in the Republic of Korea” [Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2020;11(2):85–90]2020 June;11(3)

Associations between Social and Physical Environments, and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions2018 January;9(1)

Corrigendum to “Evaluation of Potency on Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoid for Adult Vaccines by In Vivo Toxin Neutralization Assay Using National Reference Standards”[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(5):278–82]2018 December;9(6)

Corrigendum to “Epidemiological Characterization of Imported Systemic Mycoses Occurred in Korea” [Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(5):255–60]2018 December;9(6)

Article and Issues
For this journal
For authors
Ethics
Editorial Office
National Center for Medical Information and Knowledge,
202, Ossongsengmyung 2nd street, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28159, South Korea
Editorial Office Contact: ophrp@korea.kr               

Copyright © 2021 by Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. All rights reserved.

Close layer
prev next