Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives


Author index

Page Path
HOME > Articles and issues > Author index
Jun Woo Kim 1 Article
A Strategic Plan for the Second Phase (2013–2015) of the Korea Biobank Project
Ok Park, Sang Yun Cho, So Youn Shin, Jae-Sun Park, Jun Woo Kim, Bok-Ghee Han
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2013;4(2):107-116.   Published online April 30, 2013
  • 2,957 View
  • 25 Download
  • 11 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The Korea Biobank Project (KBP) was led by the Ministry of Health and Welfare to establish a network between the National Biobank of Korea and biobanks run by university-affiliated general hospitals (regional biobanks). The Ministry of Health and Welfare started the project to enhance medical and health technology by collecting, managing, and providing researchers with high-quality human bioresources. The National Biobank of Korea, under the leadership of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, collects specimens through various cohorts and regional biobanks within university hospitals gather specimens from patients. The project began in 2008, and the first phase ended in 2012, which meant that there needed to be a plan for the second phase that begins in 2013. Consequently, professionals from within and outside the project were gathered to develop a plan for the second phase. Under the leadership of the planning committee, six working groups were formed to formulate a practical plan. By conducting two workshops with experts in the six working groups and the planning committee and three forums in 2011 and 2012, they have developed a strategic plan for the second phase of the KBP. This document presents a brief report of the second phase of the project based on a discussion with them.During the first phase of the project (2008–2012), a network was set up between the National Biobank of Korea and 17 biobanks at university-affiliated hospitals in an effort to unify informatics and governance among the participating biobanks. The biobanks within the network manage data on their biospecimens with a unified Biobank Information Management System. Continuous efforts are being made to develop a common standard operating procedure for resource collection, management, distribution, and personal information security, and currently, management of these data is carried out in a somewhat unified manner. In addition, the KBP has trained and educated professionals to work within the biobanks, and has also carried out various publicity promotions to the public and researchers. During the first phase, biospecimens from more than 300,000 participants through various cohorts and biospecimens from more than 200,000 patients from hospitals were collected, which were distributed to approximately 600 research projects.The planning committee for the second phase evaluated that the first phase of the KBP was successful. However, the first phase of the project was meant to allow autonomy to the individual biobanks. The biobanks were able to choose the kind of specimens they were going to collect and the amount of specimen they would set as a goal, as well as being allowed to choose their own methods to manage their biobanks (autonomy). Therefore, some biobanks collected resources that were easy to collect and the resources needed by researchers were not strategically collected. In addition, there was also a low distribution rate to researchers outside of hospitals, who do not have as much access to specimens and cases as those in hospitals. There were also many cases in which researchers were not aware of the KBP, and the distribution processes were not set up to be convenient to the demands of researchers.Accordingly, the second phase of the KBP will be focused on increasing the integration and cooperation between the biobanks within the network. The KBP plans to set goals for the strategic collection of the needed human bioresources. Although the main principle of the first phase was to establish infrastructure and resource collection, the key objective of the second phase is the efficient utilization of gathered resources. In order to fully utilize the gathered resources in an efficient way, distribution systems and policies must be improved. Vitalization of distribution, securing of high-value resource and related clinical and laboratory information, international standardization of resource management systems, and establishment of a virtuous cycle between research and development (R&D) and biobanks are the four main strategies. Based on these strategies, 12 related objectives have been set and are planned to be executed.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • History of the largest global biobanks, ethical challenges, registration, and biological samples ownership
    Hajar Yaghoobi, Sayedeh Azimeh Hosseini
    Journal of Public Health.2023; 31(3): 467.     CrossRef
  • Healthcare data quality assessment for improving the quality of the Korea Biobank Network
    Ki-Hoon Kim, Seol Whan Oh, Soo Jeong Ko, Kang Hyuck Lee, Wona Choi, In Young Choi, Ahmed Meri
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294554.     CrossRef
  • Challenges and opportunities in establishing a regional biobank center in a developing country: A case from the Philippines
    Gerard G. Dumancas, Khalil Frederik K. Smith, Adrienne Marrie Bugayong-Janagap, Pia Regina Fatima C. Zamora, Victor Marco Emmanuel N. Ferriols, Aretha G. Liwag, Joselito F. Villaruz, Ma. Luz Vicenta V. Guanzon, Hans Francis D. Ferraris, Terry Rodney, Romu
    Health Policy and Technology.2023; : 100822.     CrossRef
  • Common Data Model and Database System Development for the Korea Biobank Network
    Soo-Jeong Ko, Wona Choi, Ki-Hoon Kim, Seo-Joon Lee, Haesook Min, Seol-Whan Oh, In Young Choi
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(24): 11825.     CrossRef
  • Next Chapter of the Taiwan Biobank: Sustainability and Perspectives
    Jui-Chu Lin, Li-Kuei Chen, Wesley Wei-Wen Hsiao, Chien-Te Fan, Mei Lan Ko
    Biopreservation and Biobanking.2019; 17(2): 189.     CrossRef
  • A compilation of national plans, policies and government actions for rare diseases in 23 countries
    Neil Khosla, Rodolfo Valdez
    Intractable & Rare Diseases Research.2018; 7(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • The Need for Research Infrastructures: A Narrative Review of Large-Scale Research Infrastructures in Biobanking
    Anthony Larsson
    Biopreservation and Biobanking.2017; 15(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Development of an Integrated Biospecimen Database among the Regional Biobanks in Korea
    Hyun Sang Park, Hune Cho, Hwa Sun Kim
    Healthcare Informatics Research.2016; 22(2): 129.     CrossRef
  • Biobank Regulation in South Korea
    Won Bok Lee
    Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.2016; 44(2): 342.     CrossRef
  • The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability
    Hana Odeh, Lisa Miranda, Abhi Rao, Jim Vaught, Howard Greenman, Jeffrey McLean, Daniel Reed, Sarfraz Memon, Benjamin Fombonne, Ping Guan, Helen M. Moore
    Biopreservation and Biobanking.2015; 13(6): 421.     CrossRef
  • Current Status, Challenges, Policies, and Bioethics of Biobanks
    Byunghak Kang, Jaesun Park, Sangyun Cho, Meehee Lee, Namhee Kim, Haesook Min, Sooyoun Lee, Ok Park, Bokghee Han
    Genomics & Informatics.2013; 11(4): 211.     CrossRef

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives