Bongjeong Kim; Hye Sun Hyun

doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.11

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Osong Public Health Res Perspect > Volume 9(5); 2018 > Article

Corrigendum Corrigendum to “Associations between Social and Physical Environments, and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions”[Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1):16–24]: Bongjeong Kim^a, Hye Sun Hyun^b; Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 2018;9(5):283-285.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.11
Published online: October 31, 2018

^aDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea

^bDepartment of Nursing, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Korea

*Corresponding author: Hye Sun Hyun, Department of Nursing, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Korea, E-mail: hshyun76@gmail.com

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

4,081 Views
21 Download

Full Article

Download PDF

Article information
Reference

The authors regret to report that in the original paper [1], the OR and 95% CI values of the individual level variables in Table 4 are missing. Furthermore, the OR values and 95% CI values of individual and community level variables are missing or incorrectly presented in Table 5.

The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Table 4

Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; urban.

		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI
Fixed effect

Individual level

Gender	Male (ref)
Gender	Female			0.675	0.653–0.696	0.675	0.653–0.697

Age (y)	19–34 (ref)
	35–49			1.033	0.988–1.081	1.033	0.988–1.080
	50–64			1.295	1.299–1.364	1.295	1.229–1.364

Marital status	Living with spouse (ref)
	Divorced, and bereaved			1.086	1.028–1.147	1.086	1.028–1.363
	Single			1.377	1.314–1.443	1.376	1.313–1.442

Education	Uneducated (ref)
	Elementary school			1.019	0.861–1.205	1.019	0.861–1.206
	Middle school			1.004	0.846–1.190	1.004	0.847–1.191
	High school			0.963	0.813–1.142	0.965	0.814–1.144
	≥College/University			1.042	0.874–1.242	1.044	0.876–1.244

Job	Non-manual (ref)
	Manual			1.077	1.034–1.121	1.078	1.035–1.122
	Housewife, unemployed			1.022	0.985–1.059	1.022	0.985–1.059

Household income / monthly	<100			1.129	1.041–1.224	1.129	1.040–1.224
	100–200			1.075	0.993–1.164	1.075	0.993–1.164
	201–300			1.171	1.081–1.268	1.170	1.080–1.267
	301–400			1.176	1.088–1.269	1.175	1.088–1.268
	≥401(ref)

Self-rated health	Poor (ref)
	Neither good nor			1.098	1.059–1.138	1.097	1.059–1.138
	Very good			1.217	1.169–1.267	1.217	1.169–1.266

No. of Chronic diseases	0 (ref)
	1			1.040	0.995–1.086	1.040	0.995–1.086
	≥2			0.916	0.865–0.969	0.916	0.865–0.969

BMI	Obesity			0.974	0.939–1.009	0.974	0.939–1.009

Community level

Satisfaction with safety						1.362	0.256–5.941

Satisfaction with natural environment						0.446	0.159–1.378

Satisfaction with living environment						2.596	0.382–17.314

Satisfaction with public transportation						2.829	1.001–7.223

Satisfaction with health service						0.927	0.357–2.288

Social cohesion						0.660	0.308–1.477

Social networks						0.969	0.876–1.072

Social activity participation						2.534	0.768–14.318

Presence of cycle paths (ref=no)						0.993	0.815–1.148

Number of exercise facilities						1.001	0.996–1.001

Number of sports park						0.978	0.960–0.995

Number of hiking trails						0.994	0.989–0.999

Community level random effect

Between community variance (SE)		0.1389(0.026)		0.1406(0.027)		0.0938(0.022)

ICC		0.040		0.040		0.028

Statistics for the model fit

Log likelihood		−53990.092		−50962.909		−50943.399

Likelihood-ratio test

χ² (p)		2198.89(<.001)		2074.46 (<.001)		1339.29(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

Table 5

Effects of individual and community level factors upon moderate or vigorous physical activity: a multilevel analysis; rural.

		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI
Fixed effect

Individual level

Gender	Male (ref)
Gender	Female			0.728	0.696–0.760	0.728	0.696–0.760

Age (y)	19–34 (ref)
	35–49			1.102	1.026–1.184	1.102	1.025–1.183
	50–64			1.310	1.207–1.422	1.309	1.206–1.420

Marital status	Living with spouse (ref)
	Divorced, and bereaved			1.030	0.962–1.104	1.031	0.963–1.104
	Single			1.162	1.080–1.251	1.161	1.079–1.250

Education	Uneducated (ref)
	Elementary school			1.019	0.861–1.205	1.019	0.861–1.206
	Middle school			1.004	0.846–1.190	1.004	0.847–1.191
	High school			0.963	0.813–1.142	0.965	0.814–1.144
	≥College/University			1.042	0.874–1.242	1.044	0.876–1.244

Job	Non-manual (ref)
	Manual			1.379	1.310–1.452	1.377	1.307–1.450
	Housewife, unemployed			0.854	0.806–0.905	0.855	0.807–0.905

Household income / monthly	<100			1.070	1.001–1.163	1.079	1.001–1.164
	100–200			1.155	1.069–1.247	1.156	1.070–1.249
	201–300			1.147	1.057–1.245	1.149	1.059–1.248
	301–400			1.178	1.090–1.273	1.091	1.101–1.274
	≥401(ref)

Self-rated health	Poor (ref)
	Neither good nor			1.058	1.007–1.111	1.058	1.007–1.111
	Very good			1.175	1.115–1.237	1.174	1.114–1.236

No. of Chronic diseases	0 (ref)
	1			1.091	1.033–1.152	1.091	1.033–1.152
	≥2			1.012	0.947–1.082	1.012	0.947–1.082

BMI	Obesity			0.985	0.941–1.031	0.985	0.941–1.031

Community level

Satisfaction with safety						0.047	0.003–0.867

Satisfaction with natural environment						4.404	0.741–26.156

Satisfaction with living environment						0.277	0.061–1.253

Satisfaction with public transportation						2.604	0.781–8.680

Satisfaction with health service						1.728	0.592–5.039

Social cohesion						4.693	1.216–18.114

Social networks						1.023	0.913–1.158

Social activity participation						0.515	0.203–1.303

Presence of cycle paths (ref=no)						1.328	1.007–1.751

Number of exercise facilities						0.997	0.994–1.001

Number of sports park						1.026	1.001–1.058

Number of hiking trails						1.025	1.006–1.044

Community level random effect

Between community variance (SE)		0.1695(0.033)		0.1627(0.032)		0.1123(0.027)

ICC		0.049		0.047		0.033

Statistics for the model fit

Log likelihood		−30539.61		−27952.831		−27937.739

Likelihood-ratio test

χ² (p)		1472.76(<.001)		1261.70(<.001)		882.40(<.001)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval, ICC = intra-class correlation.

Article information

DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.1.04.

Reference

1. Kim BJ, Hyun HS. Associations between Social and Physical Environments,and Physical Activity in Adults from Urban and Rural Regions. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2018;9(1). 16−24. PMID: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.1.04. PMID: 29503801. PMID: 5831682.Article PubMed PMC PDF

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

PubReader
Cite

Cite

export Copy Format

Close

XML Download

Related articles

Correction to “The risk associated with psychiatric disturbances in patients with diabetes in Indonesia (2018): a cross-sectional observational study” [Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2023;14(5):368–78]